天才一秒记住【热天中文网】地址：https://www.rtzw.net
“价值”
的角度来把握人文社会科学的对象。
哲学解释学提出了“解释学经验”
的概念，将它作为理解的对象，意在把握科学活动与人类行为的本体论前提。
笔者则提出“语境论”
的解释观，将科学解释与人文理解的不同，归结为问题语境的差别。
[1]OnAristotle’sOion，Ammonius；translatedbyDavidBlank.WithOnAristotle’sOiohius：firstandseeranslatedbyzmann；withessaysbyRichardSorabji，zmann&MarioMignuciae.Itha.Y.：iversityPress，1998.
[2]MartinHeidegger：PhenomenologiterpretationofAristotle.Top，.2010，Vol.23，Issue2:136-156.
[3]AnEssaygHumaanding，1690.InhisEssay，Lockeexplainsthegradualunfoldingofthisind.ArguingagainstboththeAugustinianviewofmanasinallysinfulaesianposition，whichholdsthatmaninnatelyknowsbasiclogicalpropositiosay”
mind，atabularasa，whichisshapedbyexperieioiowosourcesofallourideas.JohnLoulationoftabularasainAnEssaygHumaanding.
[4]RichardH.Popkin:DialoguesghePosthumousEssays，OftheImmortalityoftheSoul，andOfSuiAnEnquirygHumaandingofMiracles，DavidHumeedited，withanintrodudianapolis：HackettPub，c1998.
[5]TheCambridgepaniontoLocke’s“EssaygHumaaedbyLexNewman，Cambridge;NewYeUyPress，2007.
[6]NicholasRestifiatioanding：EssaysandRationalityinSham，MD：UyPressofAmerica，c1983.
[7]J.D.Trout：“StifiationandtheSense”
，PhilosophyofS.，2002，Vol.69，Issue2：212-233.
[8]K.Khalifa：“Inauguratiandingiion？”
PhilosophyofS，2012，791：15-37.该文大意如下：Retly，severalauthorshavearguedthatstifiderstandingshouldbeaopicofphilosophicalresearthisarticle，Iarguethatthethreemostdevelopedats-Grimm’s，deRegt’s，aandDieks’s-bereplacedbyearlierideasaboutstifiationwithoutloss.Indeed，insomecases，suchreplatshaveefits.
[9]He，DeextualApproachtoStifiderstanding，Synthese，Mar.，2005，Vol.144，Issue1：137-170.该文大意如下：Aguandingofnatureisoheaimsofsthispaperweofferananalysisofthenatureofstifiderstandingthataccordswithactualstificpradaodatesthehistoricaldiversityofs.Itscoreideaisageerioelligibilityofstifictheoriesthatisessentiallytextual：whichtheoriestothisdependsoualfadgeinthee.Ouranalysisprovidesageneralatofhisprovidedbystifiatioypes.Inthisway，itrefligviewsofexplanat，suchasthecausal-meidtheunifiists.
[10]ErikWeber：Explaiandingaheories，Erkenntnis，Jan.，1996，Vol.44，Issue1:1-23，23p.该文大意如下：Oioifiowledgeistoprovidethetheoriesandlawsweneediouheworld.Myarticledealswiththeepistemicaspederstahuandingasunifiistoexplicatewhatwehavetodoiomakeourstifiowledgetributetoahedegreetowhichthepartitswehaveobserved，fitintoourworld-picture.Theanalysisstwoparts.FirstIdefiofstificepistemiatioioypearetheappropriateisfthedegreeofunifiofthepartitswehaveobserved.Inthesed，largestpartoftheartialyzethestruprocessofstificepistemiations，fotheappliofstifictheories.
[11]EBriaifiderstanding，2006，http：philsci-archive.pitt.edu29521UandingBJPS.doc;http：philsci-archive.pitt.edu2952.该条目大意如下：Manyofthoseavolvedinthephysicesadoptareduistpointofview，inectsoftheworldareultimatelytrolledbyphysicallaressedintermsofmathematicalequations.Inthisarticleluralisticapproaaandinginwhichmathematicallyexpressedlawsofnaturearemerelyonewayamongseveralaworldthatistoovastandiograspiy.
[12]FritzRohrlitifiation：FrLawtTheory，PSA：ProgsoftheBiehePhilosophyofSceAsso，1994，Vol.1994，VolumeOributedPapers：69-77.该文大意如下：Anewmodelofstifiationisproposed：thegtheorymodel.Itsgoalisuanding.Oheappropriatestifictheoryahinit.Fromthesefollowsthefungoftheexplahewayinwhichthemodelportraysitoiitivelevel.Itrequiresanontologyahecausalprocesses，probabilities，orpotentialities（propensities）agtowhis.Thisknowledgeyieldsuainitivelevelsdemandpluralistitologies.Aionisbelievedoroeddependingoyofthetheoryaionsinthemodel.
[13]He，SabinaLeonelli，KaiEigifiderstanding：philosophicalperspectives，Pittsburgh，Pa：UyofPittsburghPress，c2009.该著由如下论文组成：1.FoStifiderstandingHe，SabinaLeonellia.I.Uaion，andIntelligibility—2.UandingaifiationHe—3.UandingwithoutExplaon—4.OntologidtheIntelligibilityofEpistemicActivitiesHasokg—5.ReliabilityandtheSenseStephenR.Grimm—6.TheIllusiohiriYlikoski—Pt.II.UandingandModels—7.UandinginPhysitheAbstracttotheargaretMorrisbyModeliualApproachTarjaKnuuttilaandMartiheGreatDeluge：SimulationModelingaifiderstandingJoha.Ⅲ.UandiificPractiderstandinginBiology：TheImpureNatureofBiologiowledgeSabinaLeonelli—11.UandinginEiodelsMaraandinginPhysi-UpversusTop-DownDennisDieks—13.UandingintheEngineerierpretiveStructuresMiekeBooandinginPsychology：IsUandingaSurplus？KaiEigner—15.UandinginPolitice：ThePluralityofEpistemiterestsJeroenVanBouwel—16.UandinginHistoritelligibilityaEdwinKoster.
[14]RuthBerger：UandingSce：WhyCausesAreNotEnough，1998，Vol.65，Issue2：306-332该文大意如下：Thispaperisanempiricalcritiqueofcausalatsofstifiatioionswhinonlineardynamicalmodeliherequirementofcausalrelevahtaobestitutiveofstifiation.Inaddition，causalatsobscurehowtheproaticalmodelingproduatoryinformation.Iadvasfortheinadequacyofcausalats.First，Iarguethatexplanatorilyrelevantinformationisnotalwaysinformationaboutcauses，eveheexplanandumhasaifiablecausalhistory.Sed，Iarguethattreatiiatioieneralcausallawsdoesnotaccuratelydescribethetypesof“top-dowionstypiicalmodeling.Finally，Iarguethatcausalmeitsofexplarinsierabletotheirrelevan.
[15]GerhardSchurz，KarelLambert：OutliheoryofStifiderstandi.，1994，Vol.101，Issue1：65-120.该文包括如下内容：Thebasictheoryofstifiderstaediiohreemai，thattouandaphenomeniveobeabletofitPiivebadcorpusC（oftheagetofitPintoCistoectPwithpartsofC（via“arguments”
inaverybroadsehattheunifiofcreases.Third，thattheitivevolvedinunifibetreatedassequencesofshiftsofphenomenainC.Howthetheoryfitstypicalexamplesandhowitexcludesspuriousunifisisexplaiion3givesaformaldesofthestructureofitivecorpuseswhidescriptiveaswellasiialpoheoryofunifiisthehelightofsocalled“puzzlioeantdistins，suchasthatbetweentanddissoandiherefiheoryisappliedtoseveralexamples，amongthemacasestudyofthedevelopmeomicmodel.Thefinalpartsaclassifiofkindsandadisoftherelatioandiion.
[16]MarkNewmaialModelofStifiderstandiiohePhilosophyofSce，Mar2012，Vol.26，Issue1：1-26.该文主要内容如下：InthisarticleIarguethattwotatsofstifiderstandingareiandIproposeaheory.Mydrawsoresearitivepsychologywhichrevealstheimportanakingdlogiferehebasisofininginformatioandapheomakepartidsofinfereheexplanatiiven.Specifically，weetouandaphenomeificallybydevelopialmodelsthatihecorrectdlogicalpropertiesrespohecausesicalpropertiesofthephenomenonbeingexplained.
[17]HeheEpistemicValue”
，PhilosophyofSce，Dec2009，Vol.76，Issue5：585-597.该文大意如下：Thisartialyzestheepistemicvalueandoffersanatoftherolei，Idiscusstheobjectivistviewoftherelatioweeioanding，defendedbyCarlHempelandJ.D.Trout.Igethisviewbyarguingthatpragmaticaspectsofexplanationarecrucialforagtheepistemicaimsofsce.Subsequeananalysisofthesepragmaticaspetermsof“intelligibility”
aualatofstifiderstahisnotion.
[18]〔德〕卡尔-奥托·阿佩尔：《解释——理解争论的历史回顾》，《哲学译丛》1987年第6期。
[19]〔苏兰〕F.赖特：《说明和理解》，《哲学译丛》1988年第5期。
[20]W.：FourDecadesofStifiatioheUyofMiaPress，1989：8.
本章未完，请点击下一章继续阅读！若浏览器显示没有新章节了，请尝试点击右上角↗️或右下角↘️的菜单，退出阅读模式即可，谢谢！